!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->

Galwan Valley Clash Was Chinese “Warning” to India: Australian Defence Minister

Marles said that China has so far failed to address its military build-up with adequate diplomacy and as a result, countries have shored up their defences in response.

June 23, 2022
Galwan Valley Clash Was Chinese “Warning” to India: Australian Defence Minister
Indian DM Rajnath Singh (R) with Australian counterpart Richard Marles, New Delhi
IMAGE SOURCE: RAJNATH SINGH/TWITTER

Australian Defence Minister (DM) Richard Marles said on Wednesday that the Chinese assault on Indian forces in the Galwan Valley along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) two years ago was a “warning” for all countries. He stressed that Australia was among the countries that stood firmly in support of India’s sovereignty during the clash.

Marles, who is also Australia’s deputy prime minister, said “it is vital that China commits to resolving this dispute through a process of dialogue consistent with international law.”  He was speaking at the National Defence College in New Delhi, where he also met with his counterpart, Rajnath Singh.

Noting that the “global rules-based order matters everywhere, including in the highest place on earth,” Marles emphasised that “it is critical that China’s neighbours do not see its build-up as a risk for them.” “Because without that reassurance, it is inevitable that countries will seek to upgrade their own military capabilities in response,” he added.

He said in his speech that China has so far failed to address its military build-up with adequate diplomacy and as a result, countries have shored up their defences in response, effectively leading to an arms race with Beijing at the centre of it.

“Insecurity is what drives an arms race,” he said, referring to concerns among countries over China’s military build-up and hostile actions in its neighbourhood.

Saying that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is another warning for countries to strengthen their alliances, Marles called for greater security cooperation between New Delhi and Canberra. However, he stressed that such cooperation is not meant to counter China, noting, “There is nothing remarkable about two democracies working together in response to strategic change.”

He also said that while Australia respects the right of any country to modernise its military capabilities, “large-scale military build-ups must be transparent [and] be accompanied by statecraft that reassures.” In this respect, Marles said that China is a strong country that has a powerful voice in regional and international affairs but Beijing needs to ensure the respect for the rule of law.

Marles further told ABC News that “for India and Australia, China is our largest trading partner. And for India and Australia, China is our biggest security anxiety.” The Australian DM also suggested that New Delhi and Canberra should allow each other’s military planes and ships to access and use their respective defence facilities. “Reciprocal access is a logical next step, especially for working together with India on maritime surveillance in the Bay of Bengal and the access points into the Pacific,” he told the network.

In this respect, Marles and his Indian counterpart Rajnath Singh agreed to bolster India and Australia’s Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, build upon the existing Mutual Logistics Support Arrangement, and boost their partnership through the Joint Working Group on Defence Research and Materiel Cooperation.

“The Ministers discussed further opportunities for industrial cooperation between India and Australia to increase the resilience of supply chains and deliver capabilities to their respective defence forces,” a joint statement said. They also stressed the importance of working together to ensure “an open, free, inclusive, prosperous and rules-based Indo Pacific region,” pointing to their “shared values” of “democracy and rule of law.” Additionally, Singh said that India will participate in Australia’s upcoming Indo-Pacific Endeavour naval exercise.

In this respect, Marles described India as a “top tier partner and close friend” of Australia.

Furthermore, in a column for the Indian Express, Marles wrote, “The case for Australia making India a priority is unassailable: Australia must strengthen its understanding of and engagement with the world’s soon-to-be most populous nation and a deeply consequential power.” He added that his visit was based on the newly-inducted Albanese government’s commitment “to place India at the heart of Australia’s approach to the Indo-Pacific and beyond.”

He also outlined a plan to: boost cooperation in protecting global supply chains; leverage India’s technological, scientific, and manufacturing prowess; conduct joint naval and air exercises; jointly tackle climate change.

“Australia’s interests don’t just align with India’s, they are inextricably entwined. Expect this relationship to grow and prosper, our cooperation to deepen,” he concluded.

Although Marles took a tough approach to China during his visit to India, he also underscored the Albanese administration’s commitment to the ‘one-China’ principle during a recent meeting with his Chinese counterpart Gen. Wei Fenghe.